Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443
Original file (BC 2013 05443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05443

	XXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 
12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a pre-existing medical condition that precluded him from obtaining an overall satisfactory rating on the contested FAs.  

In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a “Medical Determination” letter, signed by his medical provider, which states he “had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA(s)” dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13; and a VA Form 10-5345, Request for and Authorization to Release Medical Records, dated 5 Sep 13, requesting that any medical documents that validate his condition during the contested FAs be released. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On the date the application was submitted the applicant was serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).

On 17 Dec 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 0.00, which constituted an “Unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio (1-Mile Walk) – 35/0.00, Abdominal Circumference – 39.50”/00.00 points, Push-ups – Exempt, Sit-ups – Exempt.



On 15 Mar 13, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 69.75, which constituted an “Unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio (1-Mile Walk) – 39/42.30, Abdominal Circumference – 38.50”/13.50 points, Push-ups – Exempt, Sit-ups – Exempt.

On 12 Jun 13, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 74.13, which constituted an “Unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio (1-Mile Walk) – 40/44.90, Abdominal Circumference – 38.00”/14.40 points, Push-ups – Exempt, Sit-ups – Exempt.

A “Medical Determination Letter” (Not Dated), provided by the applicant indicates that he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score.  

On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), stating, “There was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant's medical provider.  Also, there was no letter from the commander invalidating the Fitness Assessment.”

_______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the contested FAs in AFFMS due to lack of supporting evidence.  DPSIM states, while the applicant provided a medical memorandum and the medical provider stated that he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the FA, there was no evidence of what the applicant's limitations were for each fitness assessment. The applicant did not provide an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, that lists his physical limitations.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 12 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  While the applicant has provided a letter from his medical provider indicating he had a medical condition, he has not met his burden of proving the contested FAs should be removed from his records. In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; support from his commander requesting the FAs be invalidated; AF Form 422 exempting him from the contested FA; or the Fitness Screening Questionnaire he was required to complete prior to participating in the assessment. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05443 in Executive Session on 6 Nov 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
	XXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXX, Member



The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05443 was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	   Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 10 Mar 14 w/atchs.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 14.							


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833

    Original file (BC 2013 05833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03517

    Original file (BC 2013 03517 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She sent medical documentation to her medical unit prior to the contested FA that should have exempted her from components of the assessment. On 19 Apr 13, the applicant provided a “Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance” signed by her medical provider and indicating that she was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441

    Original file (BC 2013 04441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” A list of the applicant’s last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04345

    Original file (BC 2013 04345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to Technical Sergeant. Therefore, in view of the fact that we have determined the evidence is sufficient to conclude there was a causal nexus between the medical condition for which the applicant received a disability discharged and his ability to attain passing scores on his FAs, we also believe it is reasonable to conclude...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682

    Original file (BC 2013 04682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of “no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078

    Original file (BC 2013 03078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00307

    Original file (BC-2013-00307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While the Board notes the recommendation from AFPC/DPSIM indicating that it was not until after his FA failure that he became restricted from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939

    Original file (BC 2013 04939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...